WWE Superstar Power Rankings for 4/20/2015: Pre-WWE Extreme Rules 2015 …
April 20, 2015 - WWE
WWE Extreme Rules 2015 is in reduction than one week, and a WWE Superstar Power Rankings have seen some poignant changes streamer into WWE’s many “extreme” eventuality of a year. For a event, there are already 6 matches set, with one or dual some-more that could presumably be combined to a card.
It was already dynamic that Randy Orton would face Seth Rollins for a WWE World Heavyweight Championship, yet we now know a prerequisites for a match. Also on Raw, Paige became a new No. 1 contender for a Divas Championship, yet her standing for Extreme Rules is in doubt after suffering inner injuries during a hands of Naomi.
The United States and Intercontinental Championship matches are also set, as good as a integrate of other matches. More on those bouts later.
This past week’s transformation will be discussed in larger fact in a following slides. But beforehand, please review how these rankings are determined.
These rankings are not a recognition competition and are not designed to establish who has a best matches or a many ability. They are particularly in-storyline energy rankings.
All active WWE Superstars and Divas on a categorical register are considered, incompatible talents who essentially or exclusively combat in NXT. Holding a championship, being a No. 1 contender or holding a Money in a Bank briefcase depends for many of a wrestler’s ranking, and these honors are therefore a many heavily weighted components in a rankings.
If a wrestler is deemed to be tied in a rankings with another, holding a pretension will be a primary tiebreaker. However, holding a championship, being a No. 1 contender or holding a Money in a Bank briefcase in no approach guarantees a mark in a tip 10.
Wins and waste comment for a bulk of a week-to-week movement and, after championships, are a many critical member of a rankings. The peculiarity and arrange of a wrestler’s opponents are deliberate in a week-to-week movement.
Getting a improved of someone—such as violence someone down—also counts, yet not scarcely as many as wins or losses. Being over with a fans (read: intensely popular) is deliberate yet not heavily weighted in a ranking decisions. Pay-per-view performances take on combined importance.
Only a tip 10 wrestlers are ranked. Wrestlers on a “Watch List” were deliberate for top-10 standing yet were eventually nixed. They are unranked, and their inventory is in no sold order.
Generally speaking, these rankings do not mangle kayfabe. However, any vital non-storyline information (serious injury, WWE Wellness Policy violations, suspensions, legitimate hirings, firings, agreement information, “sabbaticals,” etc.) might be taken into consideration, yet generally, usually if WWE confirms or addresses it publicly.
WWE’s non-televised domestic and international live events are not included in these rankings unless WWE incorporates them into radio storylines or acknowledges a eventuality on WWE television. Also, zero that could be categorically deliberate a spoiler is enclosed unless WWE acknowledges it as well.
In short, all WWE main-roster shows—televised or digitally distributed, as good as anything from WWE.com, a WWE App, a WWE Network and any WWE or Superstar accounts on amicable media that don’t mangle kayfabe—may be taken into care for these rankings.
This might embody yet is not singular to WWE Raw, WWE SmackDown, WWE Main Event, WWE Superstars, NXT, WWE pay-per-views and any storyline-driven calm from a WWE Network.